SICK OF HEARING THE WORD 'JEWS'?
_____________________________________

I, as an 'ordinary' person, am sick of hearing the word 'Jew', 'Jewish', 'Zionist' and so forth.

Here I present some data relevant to the issue of 'Jews'. Take it or leave it but all information is verifiable and I beg you to do your own research. The statements which follow are not in any order; how could they be?

I will dispense with the quotation marks (') and (') on the word Jew for purposes of  ease.

The use of the word 'evidence' implies verifiable evidence from (verifiable) sources.

I'll begin with a question: Why are 'Jews' so important in the World as it is?

A Jew is an individual, as is a Christian, or anyone else who chooses to follow a particular religion.

A Jew is not part of a race or people.

A Jew believes in a religion called Judaism. It follows that Jews should be called Judaists.

Anyone can be a Jew (believer in Judaism).

Judaism is a religion of conversion.

The word 'Jew' was invented in the 18th Century (Sheridan, The Rivals).

The word 'Semitic' refers to ancient languages (plural) which includes Hebrew. Therefore a person labelled 'anti-Semitic' is against (anti-) a language, not a race or people or an individual.

There is no written evidence that Jews ever lived in the region of Palestine as a race or a people.

There is no evidence that Jews are a race or a people, even according to many Judaists.

There is no evidence  that Jews as a race or a people have ever been victimised per se.

There is no anthropological or genetic evidence of any Jewish nation, people or race.

There is no evidence that Jews (as a race or a people) were 'singled out' for extermination by the National Socialists in Germany or anywhere else. The National Socialists merely wanted those Judaists who were taking over the country to the detriment of the indiginous population to be expelled.

There is thus no evidence of mass executions of individuals who practice Judaism as a religion any more than any other religion or persuasion.

Jews (as they call themselves) wrote most of the 'Bible' that we see, although this has been translated and changed throughout history.

The mythical 'Jesus' was not, as far as I am aware, converted to Judaism, therefore he could not be called a Jew.

Most (at least) 'modern' Jews do not come from Palestine; they lived there amongst the native population. The main centre for Judaists (after conversion to Judaism) came from Georgia.

Judaists were nomads, therefore they had no 'homeland'. This being so, they are not entitled to live in any one place by force, which is why they are spread throughout the world, as are Christians, Islamists and so forth.

Question: When do Christians demand a 'homeland'?
Question: When do Islamists demand a 'homeland'?
Question: When does any religious faction demand a 'homeland'?
Question: When do atheists or agnostics demand a' homeland'?
Question: Why do certain Judaists demand a 'homeland'?
Question: Why won't the Judaists who hold the Dead Sea Scrolls, release them for independent appraisal?

As far as I can reason, Judaists were bent on always extolling money from others. Greed is a condition of the human species per se but Judaists made a skill of extolling money. These individuals are therefore variously called bandits, thugs, pirates and so on.

If you concede to the motto: 'By deceit shall we do war' (in whatever form), then what else are you but a pathological humanoid, a plague upon the planet, a parasite of others? Deceit is a sickness of the holistic body like any disease.

I define humanoid here as some-one who is of the World-as-it-is presented to us when we arrive (are born), and not of the Earth upon which we are born to live.

Judaists seem to have a 'victim' mentality. Their perception of 'victim' seems to be a failure to integrate their religion into others because of some 'weakness' in their inherent character.

The beliefs of these individuals (Judaists) is tantamount (it seems) to anyone else's views.

Because of their skills in taking over the economy of other groups, seems to give them a certain 'right' which is available to no one else. They use 'victim' as a cudgel, like bandits, I might say.

Any religion is a belief system. That is fine as long as it does not encroach upon others. Like so-called 'alternative life-styles' it is fine if it does not encroach upon others. Likewise, 'faith' is part of that religion. It is not verifiable except upon the belief that it is only verifiable by a non-verifiable 'book', i.e. the 'bible'.

This 'bible' has been interpreted, translated and changed according to whim, not the word of an amorphous, omniscient god.

Return to CONTENTS page